Page 11 - CCCA64_2008
        P. 11
     
       	        CCCA_V2No4_Dept-Technology-FIN.qxd:CCCA_V1No2_Dept-CourtLeg-V1.qxd  11/24/08  2:42 PM  Page 17                                                                                         In-House Technology                The corollary to having a policy, of  Since the loser pays in Canada, this is in  be vulnerable and prepare accordingly.              course, is making sure that employees fol-  the interest of both sides.  For further information, see: Electronic              low it. “Train employees in the manage-  “There’s no cookbook for electronic  Discovery — A Reading List (http://              ment of electronic documents, including  discovery,” Duncan stresses.“It very much  www.practicepro.ca/practice/eDiscovery              email, and provide direction on the  depends on the nature of the litigation.”  _Rlist.asp)              appropriate use of business email,”  Corporate counsel must consider the type              Duncan advises.                   of litigation to which the company may  Alison Arnot is a writer based in Ottawa.                Once the files have been reviewed,  MT_CCCA Ad.qxp  4/3/2008  2:36 PM  Page 1              the document retention/destruction              policy is in place, and the company’s              information management has been              streamlined, have a test run.The com-              pany should have a process in place for              implementing a litigation hold and              have a drill to test it, Duncan adds.                Now, it’s the real thing; the company              is facing litigation from a competitor.              What should it do?                 “The best way to save money in e-              discovery is to make sure you follow              the Sedona Principle of‘meet and con-              fer,’” stresses Felsky. Corporate counsel              on both sides can cooperate to create a              “multi-tiered” discovery plan that con-              centrates first on review and produc-              tion of relevant data from the most              accessible sources, avoiding less accessi-  Looking at law from your              ble sources unless it is necessary,              according to cost-saving tips published  perspective.              by the Toronto Conference of the              Sedona Institute.                Both Felsky and Duncan point out                     Your lawyers should be a part of the team,              that outside counsel will be resistant to              not an obstacle to it. At Miller Thomson LLP,              cooperation with the opposing side                     our goal is helping you to reach your goals              and to limiting the scope of discovery.                by offering insight, creative thinking and              There’s tension between litigators and                 maximum value to all of our clients all              corporate counsel because outside                      of the time. That’s how we’ve become                                                                     one of Canada’s leading national law firms.              counsel will want “to over-preserve,              over-collect and over-produce,” says              Duncan.With that in mind, corporate                    Essential minds for                                                                     your essential business.              counsel needs to push back and focus              on what the litigation is about. Both                  www.millerthomson.com              sides can agree on what’s necessary by              targeting searches according to custo-              dians, time frames, locations, and type              of information sought. They should              assess the associated burden and costs              against the probability of finding              unique, relevant information, accord-                                                                    CALGARY                                                                                     LONDON                                                                            EDMONTON              ing to Sedona Institute principles.  TORONTO  VANCOUVER  GUELPH  MARKHAM  MONTRÉAL  KITCHENER-WATERLOO                                                            HIVER 2008         CCCA Canadian Corporate Counsel Association  17         CCCA64_017.indd   1                                                                              11/26/2008   05:39:20 PM
       
       
     
